|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |

Amida Ta
|
Posted - 2007.06.19 16:24:00 -
[1]
Is there any specific reason why to not make this a web-service This is cool as hell already, but as web-service it would be even better 
/me is for web-service 
|

Amida Ta
|
Posted - 2007.06.19 17:28:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Tonto Auri
Originally by: Amida Ta Is there any specific reason why to not make this a web-service This is cool as hell already, but as web-service it would be even better 
/me is for web-service 
It IS a web-service. Open Your eyes, dear...
Then where are the WSDL-Files? Moreover the output doesn't look very Web-Service like. And the input seems to be a normal HTTP post. No Web-Service style either (at least not using SOAP)...
|

Amida Ta
|
Posted - 2007.06.19 19:47:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Tonto Auri Why You think that SOAP is only one way to operate with web-based services? :)
I'm not talking about web-based services, I'm talking about Web Services and that is an industry-wide and standards-based approach and not just some service delivered over the web.
Originally by: Tonto Auri
I think that EVE devs have much cleaner look at web-services. No overhead, only real work. Yup, it MAY have no overhead, as explained in Grauw's blog.
Web services are very well defined and understood. They are proven to work and can be easily integrated in most Software-development environments accross most languages. Consuming a Web Service takes no longer that 1 minute for a service of the complexity as Eve has them. Consuming the services (for programmatic use) as they are now will likely cost up to one hour of programming (PER service). And it will cost more time whenever additional services are added or even just changed.
|

Amida Ta
|
Posted - 2007.06.21 06:35:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Tonto Auri Noone said that is important, and on IIS, I think, it cannot be fully implemented anyway. But at least moving authorisation to HTTP level (supported by all servers and most clients) and using HTTPS for API calls (supported by most servers and already exists on EVE-o) would be significant benefit to interaction.
HTTPS is probably not a good idea to use. With the supposed usage model (LOTS of atomic calls) it would put gigantic stress onto the server.
|

Amida Ta
|
Posted - 2007.06.21 23:54:00 -
[5]
Where do I get the AllianceNames from? The services only deliver an ID.
|

Amida Ta
|
Posted - 2007.06.22 18:13:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Amida Ta on 22/06/2007 18:12:31 Well, still hoping for a service/list with alliance names/IDs. Meanwhile here a sneak peak at version 0.1 of EVE Galaxy ;)
Eve Galaxy 0.1
P.S. Needs .Net Framework 2.0 to run.
|

Amida Ta
|
Posted - 2007.06.24 16:12:00 -
[7]
Could somebody with a webserver create a service that dumps the map data once a day? It seems it only gets update once a day anyways (during downtime) and having some history-data may be nice.
|

Amida Ta
|
Posted - 2007.06.24 16:49:00 -
[8]
Version 0.2 of EVE Galaxy is ready for testing ;)
News are: * Hardcoded Alliancenames (till we get an AllianceName-Retrieval-Service) * History graph display (needs a few days to collect data )
Eve Galaxy 0.2
|

Amida Ta
|
Posted - 2007.06.24 19:26:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Elissen
Do you mean this?
Whooo - how did you find out about this? Trial and error? Will update the app ;)
|

Amida Ta
|
Posted - 2007.06.24 20:24:00 -
[10]
So here is a new version that gets the Alliance-data dynamically from the server. Strangely enough the data does not seem to be entirely complete (at least two missing)
EVE Galaxy 0.3
|
|

Amida Ta
|
Posted - 2007.06.25 21:07:00 -
[11]
Edited by: Amida Ta on 25/06/2007 21:09:34
Originally by: Elissen Are you sure they are missing? It is possible that alliances are deleted and possibly even re-created. I've seen what appeared to be that the allianceID changed . In that case that particular alliance was deleted and then re-created.
Very well possible. Did code that up while watching some TV and didn't pay much attention ;) Well. Another cache for alliance data 
BTW: New Eventlog ;)
|

Amida Ta
|
Posted - 2007.06.25 22:48:00 -
[12]
Originally by: TornSoul
Originally by: Amida Ta
BTW: New Eventlog ;)
Slap some times on (hour:minute should do) and set up a RSS feed, and I think you'll make alot of ppl happy (if you havent already )
Well as far as I've seen the data currently only gets updated once per day, so not much use for hour:minute ;) And I really don't like/use RSS, so nothing from me in this space either... In fact I wouldn't even have appropriate webspace at my disposal...
|

Amida Ta
|
Posted - 2007.06.26 16:29:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Radianze Edited by: Radianze on 26/06/2007 12:16:01
Quote: <balance>***********</balance><attributeEnhancers /><attributes><intelligence>7</intelligence><memory>9</memory><charisma>5</charisma><perception>8</perception><willpower>10</willpower></attributes>
As u can see on this source output theres a missing "<attributeEnhancers >" tag is this problem caused by CCP or is it just my code?
I'm not sure what you mean, but in the quoted output no "<attributeEnhancers >" tag is missing. The tag is just empty.
|

Amida Ta
|
Posted - 2007.06.27 07:36:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Victoria Scott I'd be interested in a public-posted .NET solution. (C# prefered).
The basic stuff in C# is very simple:
WebClient client = new WebClient (); client.Headers.Add ("content-type", "application/x-www-form-urlencoded"); String uploadData = "if needed"; String data = client.UploadString ("http://...", uploadData);
|

Amida Ta
|
Posted - 2007.06.27 18:37:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Serenity Steele Shouldn't sov level II have kicked in by now? http://api.eve-online.com/map/Sovereignty.xml.aspx
If everyone with a POS received Sov1 on Tuesday last week, then even worst-case scenario should be:
Wed 1 day Thur 2 days Fri 3 days Sat 4 days Sun 5 days Mon 6 days Tues 7 days Wed 8 days = Sov2.
Is the XML bad, or is the system not working, or did I miss something?
Clearly seems like a bug to me.
My graph for today went totally crazy, too. If the data is correct then BOB lost 13 Systems since yesterday. And other Alliances would also have lost high numbers. But I assume that there is a bug which shows systems with sov > 1 as unclaimed. Perhaps it could also be a bug with constellation sov (constellation sov > 0). CCP - PLEASE FIX IT
P.S. Did you see the data now also contains the XML header so they changed something...
|

Amida Ta
|
Posted - 2007.06.27 18:39:00 -
[16]
Edited by: Amida Ta on 27/06/2007 18:41:40 If the data would be correct 157 Systems would have been lost since yesterday... 
|

Amida Ta
|
Posted - 2007.06.28 06:55:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Serenity Steele Edited by: Serenity Steele on 27/06/2007 23:40:36
Originally by: Amida Ta Edited by: Amida Ta on 27/06/2007 18:41:40 If the data would be correct 157 Systems would have been lost since yesterday... 
Yeah it's not accurate, and I think it's something to do with more than the XML, as the game client cache is also FUBAR for the results.
Additionally, I don't think it's a Sov 1 vs. Sov 2 thing only, because something like 800 systems should have gone sov 2 today.
It could be a problem with constellatons sov though. I didn't verify, but BOB does have a few constellations and SOME other alliances have, too. But not everyone has so this could explain the problem. Would be easily verifyable, but am too lazy ;)
OK I did check and it and my assumption doesn't seem to be correct.
|

Amida Ta
|
Posted - 2007.06.29 19:14:00 -
[18]
Edited by: Amida Ta on 29/06/2007 19:14:22
Originally by: CCP Garthagk I need actual information, not just "it's wrong, I think". That doesn't help me any. Thanks!
Yes, the hotfix you mentioned actually seems to be responsible for most of the stuff.
However here is another glitch in the matrix : According to the MapData (Today 21:02 GMT+1) an Alliance 760999858 holds the system O-Y5JQ
Quote: <row solarSystemID="30003761" allianceID="760999858" constellationSovereignty="0" sovereigntyLevel="1" factionID="0" solarSystemName="O-Y5JQ" />
However in the AllianceData (Today 21:02 GMT+1) there is no Alliance with ID 760999858.
|
|
|
|